The Book Pregnant Earth Mother The Book

Home Page

Known About Fluoride
  Toothpaste Warning
  Upper Intake Level
  Interferes with Brain
  Neurotoxicant

Considerations
  Timing Crucial
  Genetic Factors
  DIY Fluoridation

Revelations
  Amniotic Fluid
  Pharmacy or Faucet?
  Bogus Sales Pitch
   Statistical Spin
  Endorsements
  Crazy Advice

Fluoridation 'Science'
  CDC
  EPA
  FDA Fluoride Drugs

The Book
  Contents
  Author


Statistical Spin is SOP in Fluoridation Promotion

UC Professor's Course on Statistical Fraud

"The announced opinions and published papers favoring mechanical fluoridation of public drinking water are especially rich in fallacies, improper design, invalid use of statistical methods, omissions of contrary data, and just plain muddleheadedness and hebetude. Many of the blunders were so glaring that I gave them to my beginning freshman classes in statistics at the very first meeting. The students see through them straightway, and are afforded great amusement. Uproarious laughter frequently ensues. No special statistical equipment is necessary to detect those peccancies. Of course the class and the Group soon tired of those infantilities, and sought and found greater challenge.

"By the way, a study by John Yiamouyiannis and Dean Burke on possible connection between cancer and waterborne fluoride was fairly tightly reasoned. The statistical procedures were standard, and much better applied than in much of the Public Health work.

"As I pointed out in a letter published in the proceedings of a congressional committee investigating the above connection, the real point is that direct chemical and controlled experimental research by unbiased uncommitted agencies is urgently indicated. Clearly fluoridation should be discontinued everywhere until definitive results on safety are obtained.

"In this connection, a great source of entertainment to the Group was the ferocity with which the researchers attacked any criticism. Invariably they violated in their own work the very principles they insisted on in others' work."

Hubert A. Arnold, PhD (1980)
Department of Mathematics,
University of California, Davis

Expert in Environmental and Public Health Policy Making:
"Ironically, the 'antis,' who are usually portrayed as unscientific, often act more scientifically in the debate.... By contrast, the political profluoridation stance has evolved in to a dogmatic, authoritarian, essentially antiscientific posture, one that discourages open debate of scientific issues." – Dr. Edward Groth, III (1991)

Fun With Numbers

In a car race between America and Russia,
the Americans won, but Russian newspapers reported:
International car race: Russia takes second. America next to last.

On a diet that avoided fluoridated water, the average weight of participants was reduced from 300 to 295 pounds – a weight loss of 5 pounds.

On a diet that included fluoridated water, there was 1 more pound of weight reduction: from 300 to 294 pounds – a weight loss of 6 pounds.

Headline:
Fluoridated water increases weight loss by 20%!

April Fools posting on pro-fluoridation site

Based on a mean IQ score of 100 points:
  • With an average IQ of 97.2, fluoride-free dentists' IQ loss = 2.8 points.
  • With an average IQ of 96.6, fluoride-swilling dentists' IQ loss = 3.4 points.

Headlines (depending on how you want to spin it):
Drinking fluoridated water increases IQ loss by 21%!
Avoiding fluoridated water decreases IQ loss by 18%!